Racial Profiling by Police Essay -- Stop and Frisk

The Fourth Amendment protects the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures (108). chthonian the Fourth Amendment the legal constraints placed on police and the rules they must follow for Stop and Frisk happened as a result of the Terry v. Ohio case (162). The constraints ar that the police cannot stopped and lark about people without reasonable suspicion probable cause or a warrant. Before 1968 the police could search a shadowy only if they had probable cause. After the Terry case the police may conduct a frisk search of a suspects outmost clothing only if there was reasonable suspicion. The U.S. Supreme Court definition of Frisk is a patting down of the outer clothing of a suspect establish on the reasonable suspicion, designed to protect a police officer from attack with a weapon when making an inquiry. A Search is an exploration for evidence. Although frisk atomic number 18 restricted to a search for weapons that may pose an immediate threat to the officers safety, the Court concluded that cases as these are contumacious by their own facts generally, however, police officers who see unusual conduct that leads them to conclude that criminal activity are involved and that the persons are armed and dangerous are entitled to conduct a carefully limited search of the outer clothing of such persons trying to discover weapons that may be used to desecrate them (163) Such a frisk are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and any weapons seized is introduced in evidence. Reasonable suspicion is when a police officer has unspoilt reason to believe that criminal activity may be occurring as in the case of Terry v. Ohio (162). The police officer observed thre... ...s under OMalley (100,000) that OMalley won by a landslide by the number of arrest made. On the other hand Mayor Rawlings engaged the targeted approached and went after unpeaceful and repeated offenders which resulted i n a decrease in homicide to fewer than 200 in 2011. Racial profiling contributes to many frivolous minor infractions that burdens the prosecutors to bring these cases to greet. The court are overwhelmed with trying these cases and that takes time away from the more violent cases As a result the correctional facilities becomes overcrowded which cost the state money. Policing must not be initiated by numbers, race, ethnicity or national origin. Racial profiling violates an individuals civil right and if being done it violates the 4th Amendment right.Works CitedAlbanese, Jay S. Criminal Justice. amphetamine Saddle River Pearson, 2013. Print.

Complementarity and Substitution in the Theory of Capital :: essays papers

Complementarity and Substitution in the Theory of Capital This essay is an bill and importance of complementarity and substitution in the theory of capital. Complementarity can be usually seen in goods with sympathetic shifts in demand. It is also important to realize the narrowness of the conventional treatment of complementarity. Complementarity is examine in a single enterprise and also in the economic system as a whole. In the latter complementarity is analyzed in an economic system in equilibrium and also in disequilibrium. In an economic system with equilibrium all the acts of all individuals are undifferentiated with each other and all factors of production are complementary. The system with disequilibrium on the contrary, realizes that while a factor of substitution eliminates a nonher factor, another will be created, though possibly it might be of a different mode. It is idealistic to think that capital structure can only exist in equilibrium, only if realist ically, capital structure is in a state of continuous transformation. Any major change creates a situation of instability of the capitalistic economy. A clear-cut example of this is the accumulation of capital on profits and the inducement to invest. As capital accumulation grows, investment opportunities and the rate of profit decline. Also, the existence of unused kind or material resources provides potential complements for new productive combinations, which in result produce the changes in capital. These unused resources have two main functions in the reality of dynamic change. First, they reduce the shock when disintegration exists, and second they stimulate the investment of capital goods complementary to them. In conclusion, the theory of capital is a dynamic discipline, and is not in static equilibrium.

The Agricultural Adjustment Act :: essays research papers

The Agricultural Adjustment ActDuring World War I, Englands agricultural economy was badly damaged. This inconvenience for the English was a kindness to American husbandmans. Since the invention of the combine, and various other mechanical harvesting machines, American farmers could extend their crop yield. In turn they could export the extra crops to England for more money. erst England got back on its feet, American farmers could not find any exports for their crops. As they continued to produce more than the American people could consume, the prices of agricultural goods dramatically dropped. By the 1930s many farmers were in serious need of help, with heavy farm loans and mortgages hanging over their heads. Nothing had been done to help the farmers during The Hoover Administration. So in 1933 as part of Roosevelts New quid, the Secretary of Agriculture, Henry Wallace devised a plan to limit employment and increase prices. Which came to be known as the Agricultural Adjustme nt Act of 1933, also known as the AAA. The AAA was established on May 12, 1933 it was the New Deal creative thinker to assist farmers during the Great Depression. It was the first widespread effort to raise and stabilize farm prices and income. The law created and authorized the Agricultural Adjustment Administration to project into voluntary agreements to pay farmers to reduce production of basic commodities ( cotton, wheat, corn, rice, tobacco, hogs, milk, etc..), to make advanced payments to farmers who stored crops on the farm, create marketing agreements between farmers and middlemen, and to levy processing taxes to pay for production adjustments and market development. Basically the AAA paid farmers to destroy their crops and livestock in return for cash. In 1933 alone cotton farmers were paid $100 million to cope over their cotton crop. Six million piglets were slaughtered by the government after they bought them from farmers. The meat was canned and given to people withou t jobs. In order for this new street arab to work there needed to be money to pay the farmers, this money came from the companies that bought farm products in the form of taxes. While it seemed like a good idea to pay farmers to cut back on crops to lowering the surplus and boost the economy, The Supreme Court found the Act unconstitutional in 1936.