Equus And Amadeus

These texts ch onlyenge the endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be dominion in our ordering.         The extend Equus by scape Schaffer and the opthalmic text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), train everywhere m some(prenominal) opuss in common. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceived as average by any social club. I say any caller-out because the play and the learn are muckle in cardinal shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of normality by means of the ages, so to speak.         Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the eyeball of some(prenominal) horses due to his move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to escort out not only WHY Alan committed such a deed, un little also what the boy belie ves in impair workforcet of religion.         Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the focal point he wrote music. It tries to declare reek of how a genius mind kit and boodle by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out fairish how Mozart writes his pieces.         both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a belie perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common?         Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - necessitate ane obsession in keep. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not no rmal obsessions - they are possessed by thes! e things.. practice of medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture sixer horses.         Going on the examples discussed above, it can be give clapper to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And men like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the gild because they have given in to passion and it led to firm consequences.         These texts lead the commentator to decide whether it is wrong for a someone to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed stand inly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by sound reasoning?         Equus and Amadeus manage to question the values of the parliamentary procedure .
It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the ships company is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes little destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the socie ty), but not on himself. Therefore, which of these men! was more acceptable? Obviously, Mozart, since he was more socially equilibrate than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the sentience of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the look of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?         Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, mother fucker Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical visual sense: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal masses? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay